DATA ANALYSIS

1) ANALYSIS OF THE HEIGHT AND FOOT LENGTH OF OUR PARTICIPANTS


Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
Total
N
Percent
N
Percent
N
Percent
Height of respondent
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%
Foot length of respondent
50
100.0%
0
.0%
50
100.0%



Descriptives
Statistic
Std. Error
Height of respondent
Mean
161.6087
1.14640
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
159.3049
Upper Bound
163.9124
5% Trimmed Mean
161.3496
Median
159.5333
Variance
65.712
Std. Deviation
8.10628
Minimum
146.67
Maximum
181.83
Range
35.17
Interquartile Range
12.35
Skewness
.544
.337
Kurtosis
-.235
.662
Foot length of respondent
Mean
24.4033
.18853
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
24.0245
Upper Bound
24.7822
5% Trimmed Mean
24.3333
Median
24.0667
Variance
1.777
Std. Deviation
1.33308
Minimum
22.43
Maximum
27.77
Range
5.33
Interquartile Range
1.68
Skewness
1.015
.337
Kurtosis
.505
.662


Height distribution
Skewness=0.544>0
Height distribution is positively skewed.
Standard error= 0.337
2 X standard error= 0.337 X 2= 0.674
0.544 < 0.674

Height distribution resembles a normal distribution as statistic is with 2 standard errors.

Foot length distribution
Skewness= 1.015 >0
Foot length distribution is positively skewed.
Standard error=0.337
2X standard error= 0.337 X 2=0.674
1.015> 0.674

Foot length distribution does not resemble a normal distribution as statistic exceeds 2 standard errors.

2) EXPLORING THE CORRELATION BETWEEN FOOT LENGTH AND HEIGHT AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Null hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between foot length and height


As both variables are scale measurement, Pearson's correlation coefficient is used to measure the correlation between height and foot length.
Correlation Table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's R
.880
.033
12.808
.000c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman Correlation
.816
.066
9.784
.000c
N of Valid Cases
50
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

From the table,
Pearson's Correlation Coeffcient = 0.880. This indicates a strong positive relationship between the height and the foot length of person.
N= 40, p <0.05:
Null hypothesis is rejected.


3) REGRESSION EQUATION

Model Summary
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
.880
.774
.769
.641
The independent variable is Height of respondent.


Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
Height of respondent
.145
.011
.880
12.808
.000
(Constant)
1.027
1.827
.562
.577
So,

LINEAR EQUATION:
Foot length = (0.145 X Height) + 1.027